Searching for Jobs? Best IT Companies looking out for you at TimesJobs . Apply Now ! Click Here

###

## EXAMPLES WORKED OUT IN DETAIL BY MASTER PUZZLISTS

### 1. Geoffrey Mott-Smith In "Mathematical Puzzles for Beginners & Enthusiasts"©

S E N D

+ M O R E

------------

M O N E Y

We
see at once that M in the total must be 1

**,**since the total of the column SM cannot reach as high as 20**.**Now if M in this column is replaced by 1, how can we make this column total as much as 10 to provide the 1**carried over to the left below? Only by making S very large: 9 or 8. In either case the letter O must stand for zero: the summation of SM could produce only 10 or 11****,**but we cannot use 1 for letter O as we have already used it for M**.**If letter O is zero, then in column EO we cannot reach a total as high as 10**,**so that there will be no 1**to carryover from this column to SM. Hence S must positively be 9. Since the summation EO gives N, and letter O is zero, N must be 1****greater than E and the column NR must total over 10. To put it into an equation: E + 1 = N From the NR column we can derive the equation: N + R + (+ 1) = E + 10 We have to insert the expression (+ 1) because we don’t know yet whether 1****is carried over from column DE. But we do know that 1 has to be carried over from column NR to EO. Subtract the first equation from the second: R + (+1) = 9 We cannot let R equal 9, since we already have S equal to****9. Therefore we will have to make R equal to 8; hence we know that 1****has to be carried over from column DE. Column DE must total at least 12****,**since Y cannot be 1 or zero. What values can we give D and E to reach this total? We have already used 9 and 8 elsewhere. The only digits left that are high enough are 7, 6 and 7, 5. But remember that one of these has to be E, and N is 1**greater than E. Hence E must be 5, N must be 6, while D is 7. Then Y turns out to be 2****,**and the puzzle is completely solved. © Copyright Dover Publications, Inc., New York, 1954, ISBN 0-486-20198-8.###
__2. Steven
Kahan__ In "Take a Look at a Good
Book"©

E A T

+ T H A T

------------

A P P L E

Since every four-digit number is less than
10,000 and every three-digit number is less than 1,000, the sum of two such
numbers is necessarily less than 11,000. This sum, though, is a five-digit
number, hence is greater than 10,000. Consequently, A must be 1 and P must be
0. Further, we can conclude that T = 9. Otherwise, we would be adding a number
less than 1,000 to one less than 9,000, leaving us short of the requisite
total. The units column then produces E = 8 while generating a carryover of 1
into the tens column. Together with the previously found value of A, we learn
from the tens column that L = 3. Finally, the hundreds column yields the
equation E + H = P + 10, where the "10" is required to accommodate
the needed carryover into the thousands column. When the values of E and P are
substituted into this relationship, we get 8 + H = 10, from which it follows
that H = 2. Therefore, the unique solution of the puzzle turns out to be 819 +
9219 = 10038. © Copyright Baywood Publishing Company, Inc., Amityville, New
York, 1996, ISBN 0-89503-142-6.

### 3. J. A. H. Hunter In "Entertaining Mathematical Teasers and How to Solve Them"©

N O

G U N

+ N O

----------

H U N T

Obviously
H = 1. From the NUNN column we must have "carry 1," so G = 9, U =
zero. Since we have "carry" zero or 1 or 2 from the ONOT column,
correspondingly we have N + U = 10 or 9 or 8. But duplication is not allowed,
so N = 8 with "carry 2" from ONOT. Hence, O + O = T + 20 - 8 = T +
12. Testing for T = 2, 4 or 6, we find only T = 2 acceptable, O = 7. So we have
87 + 908 + 87 = 1082. © Copyright Dover Publications, Inc., New York,
1983, ISBN 0-486-24500-4.

### 4. Maxey Brooke In "150 Puzzles In Crypt-Arithmetic"©

A B C

x D E

----------

F E C

D E C

----------

H G B C

In
the second partial product we see D x A = D, hence A = 1. D x C and E x C both
end in C, hence C = 5. D and E must be odd. Since both partial products have
only three digits, neither can be 9. This leaves only 3 and 7. In the first
partial product E x B is a number of two digits while in the second partial
product D x B is a number of only one digit. Thus E is larger than D, so E = 7
and D = 3. Since D x B has only one digit, B must be 3 or less. The only two
possibilities are 0 and 2. B cannot be zero because 7B is a two-digit number.
Thus B = 2. By completing the multiplication, F = 8, E = 7, and G = 6. The
answer is 125 x 37 = 4625 © Copyright Dover Publications, Inc., New York,
1963.

### 5. Joseph S. Madachy In "Madachy´s Mathematical Recreations"©

(B E) (B E) = M O B

` `

Here
a 3-digit number is the product of a 2-digit number multiplied by itself. Basic
knowledge of the laws of multiplication will immediately force the conclusion
that B cannot be greater than 3. For if B is 4, and the lowest possible value,
0, is assigned to E then BE = 40. However, (40)(40) = 1,600, a 4-digit number,
and the product in the puzzle to be solved has but 3 digits. Convention demands
that the initial letters or symbols of alphametics cannot be 0, so B is either
1, 2, or 3. Another convention demands that 2 different letters cannot be
substituted for the same digit. That is, if B turns out to be 3, then no other
letter in this alphametic could stand for 3. Attention can be directed to E
since much can be deduced from the fact that (E)(E) ends in B. If E equals 0,
1, 5, or 6, then the product would be a number ending in 0, 1, 5, or 6,
respectively. Since the product, MOB, does not end in E, these numbers for E
are eliminated. 2, 3, 4, 7, and 8 can also be eliminated as values for E, since
they would yield the terminal digits of 4, 6, or 9 for MOB, and B has been
established as being 1, 2, or 3. Only one value for E, 9, remains: (9) (9) = 81
so B = 1, and the alphametic is solved: (BE) (BE) = MOB is (19) (19) = 361. © Copyright
Dover Publications, Inc., New York, 1979, ISBN 0-486-23762-1.

### 6. C. R. Wylie Jr. In "101 Puzzles in Thought & Logic"©

A L E

x R U M

----------

W I N E

W U W L

E W W E

-------------

E R M P N E

` `

To
systematize our work we first write in a row the different letters appearing in
the problem:

A L E R U M W I N P

` `

Over
each letter we will write its numerical equivalent when we discover it. In the
columns under the various letters we will record clues and tentative
hypotheses, being careful to put all related inferences on the same horizontal
line. In problems of this sort the digits 0 and 1 can often be found, or at
least restricted to a very few possibilities, by simple inspection. For
instance, 0 can never occur as the leftmost digit of an integer, and when any
number is multiplied by zero the result consists exclusively of zeros. Moreover
when any number is multiplied by 1 the result is that number itself. In the
present problem, however, we can identify 0 by an even simpler observation. For
in the second column from the right, N plus L equals N, with nothing carried
over from the column on the right. Hence L must be zero. In our search for 1 we
can eliminate R, U, and M at once, since none of these, as multipliers in the
second row, reproduces A L E. Moreover E cannot be 1 since U times E does not
yield a product ending in U. At present, however, we have no further clues as
to whether 1 is A, I, N, P, or W. Now the partial product W U W L ends in L,
which we know to be 0. Hence one of the two letters U and E must be 5. Looking
at the units digits of the other partial products, we see that both M x E and R
x E are numbers ending in E. A moment’s reflection (or a glance at a
multiplication table) shows that E must therefore be 5. But if E is 5, then
both R and M must be odd, since an even number multiplied by 5 would yield a
product ending in 0, which is not the case in either the first or third partial
product. Moreover, by similar reasoning it is clear that U is an even number.
At this point it is convenient to return to our array and list under U the
various possibilities, namely 2, 4, 6, and 8. Opposite each of these we record
the corresponding value of W as read from the partial product W U W L, whose
last two digits are now determined since the factor A L E is known to be _05.
These values of W are easily seen to be 1, 2, 3, and 4. From an inspection of
the second column from the left we can now deduce the corresponding
possibilities for R. As we have already noted, R must be odd; hence its value
is twice W plus 1 (the 1 being necessarily carried over from the column on the
right). The possible values for R are then 3, 5, 7, and 9, and our array looks
like this:

0 5

A L E R U M W I N P

3 2 1

5 4 2

7 6 3

9 8 4

Now
in the third column from the left in the example the sum of the digits W, U,
and W must be more than 9, since 1 had to be carried over from this column into
the column on the left. The values in the first two rows of the array are too
low for this, however, hence we can cross out both of these lines. A further
consideration of the sum of the digits W, U, and W in the third column from the
left, coupled with the fact that M is known to be odd, shows that in the third
row of the array M must be 3 while in the fourth row it must be 7. This permits
us to reject the third row of the array also, for it contains 3 for both M and
W, which is impossible. The correct solution must therefore be the one
contained in the fourth row. Hence R is 9, U is 8, M is 7, and W is 4.
Substituting these into the problem it is a simple matter to determine that A
is 6, I is 2, N is 3, and P is 1. This completes the solution.

waste koi b smiley nai bn raha .huh

ReplyDelete=p~

Delete(o)

ReplyDelete(k)

ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.

ReplyDeletesuper informative .... (h) (o)

ReplyDeletethanks a lot.. :)

:)

ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.

DeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.

ReplyDelete$-)

ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.

ReplyDeleteH A T x C U P

ReplyDeleteE I U I

E A R I

E U P I

H I E E E I

This comment has been removed by the author.

Deleteamazing...

ReplyDelete(h)

ReplyDelete=p~

ReplyDelete(k)

ReplyDeleteThis comment has been removed by the author.

Delete[-(

ReplyDelete